Guest-blogging today over at Boing Boing:
If you were the government and wanted to maintain a state of perpetual war, how would you go about it?
First, you'd need an enemy, of course, but that part would be pretty straightforward. After all, if the US government could convince the citizenry that Iraq was the 9/11 enemy but that Saudi Arabia was our friend when nineteen out of the twenty 9/11 highjackers were Saudi, it's fair to say that just about anything is possible.
But the next part would be harder. On the one hand, you'd have to claim progress in the war so that the citizenry would maintain its support for the war. On the other hand, you couldn't actually defeat the enemy, lest the war end.
That is to say, you'd have to maintain a longterm, delicate balance: we would always be winning in the war, but would never actually win the war.
With that balance in mind, your propaganda would likely be some version of, "Today, our military forces have achieved a significant victory. Of course, the enemy is insidious and resilient, and there is much hard work still ahead."
Which brings us to the latest in All The News That's Fit To Print...
Read the rest over at Boing Boing.
If you were the government and wanted to maintain a state of perpetual war, how would you go about it?
First, you'd need an enemy, of course, but that part would be pretty straightforward. After all, if the US government could convince the citizenry that Iraq was the 9/11 enemy but that Saudi Arabia was our friend when nineteen out of the twenty 9/11 highjackers were Saudi, it's fair to say that just about anything is possible.
But the next part would be harder. On the one hand, you'd have to claim progress in the war so that the citizenry would maintain its support for the war. On the other hand, you couldn't actually defeat the enemy, lest the war end.
That is to say, you'd have to maintain a longterm, delicate balance: we would always be winning in the war, but would never actually win the war.
With that balance in mind, your propaganda would likely be some version of, "Today, our military forces have achieved a significant victory. Of course, the enemy is insidious and resilient, and there is much hard work still ahead."
Which brings us to the latest in All The News That's Fit To Print...
Read the rest over at Boing Boing.
Doesn't this read like Orwell's 1984 to you? It does to me. Constant wars, constantly changing the facts and history (Hillary and Bill), and the mainstream media feeding the feeding frenzy?
ReplyDelete